The Trump administration last week dropped a Biden-era proposal that would have expanded coverage of GLP-1 drugs in Medicare and Medicaid programs, saying that it was "not appropriate at this time."
Over the last few years, GLP-1 weight-loss drugs have become more widespread, leading to a significant increase in spending on these drugs.
According to a new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, the number of U.S. adults without diabetes using GLP-1 drugs more than tripled between 2018 to 2022, growing from an annual prevalence of 0.1% to 0.4%. Annual spending on the drugs also increased from $1.6 billion to $5.8 billion during the same time.
These patients filled an average of 4.1 GLP-1 prescriptions per year, spending an average of $1,540 per prescription. However, since almost 86% of these patients had private insurance, their out-of-pocket costs for GLP-1 drugs were relatively small at $35 per prescription or $144 per year.
In a separate report from Evernorth, researchers found that pharmaceutical spending has grown significantly since GLP-1 drugs were approved for chronic weight management in 2021. Between 2021 and 2024, the annual growth rate for semaglutide increased from 2.1% to 12.8%.
In 2024, GLP-1 drugs accounted for 6.7% of total drug costs and 46.8% of the total increase in drug spending. In addition, GLP-1 drugs for weight loss saw an 210.2% increase in spending in 2023 and a 148.7% increase in 2024.
"Looking ahead, GLP-1 therapies will continue expanding beyond obesity and diabetes treatment to other chronic conditions, accelerating their widespread adoption," the researchers wrote. "While these advancements offer transformative potential in addressing the chronic disease epidemic, they also bring significant challenges raising critical questions about affordability, accessibility and long-term sustainability."
Last November, the Biden administration proposed expanding coverage of weight-loss medications in Medicare and Medicaid programs, a change that would allow 7.5 million program enrollees to access the drugs.
At the time, then-HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra called the proposal "a game changer" that "helps us recognize that obesity is with us. It's severe. It's damaging our country's health. It's damaging our economy."
However, expanding coverage of GLP-1 drugs in Medicare and Medicaid would have cost the federal government billions of dollars. According to an estimate from the Congressional Budget Office, coverage of weight-loss drugs could potentially cost Medicare an additional $35 billion between 2026 and 2034.
On Friday, the Trump administration scrapped the proposed rule to expand coverage of GLP-1 drugs. Catherine Howden, a CMS spokesperson, said the agency believed that expanding coverage was "not appropriate at this time."
To help you address the growing use of weight management drugs, Advisory Board offers several resources:
However, Howden added that CMS has not ruled out covering GLP-1 drugs for weight loss and "may consider future policy options" for the drugs.
According to Courtney Breen, an analyst at Bernstein, the Trump administration dropping the proposal was "not surprising," especially since "pharmaceutical tariffs [are] under negotiation, [and] this is not the time for the administration to give without getting."
In response to the decision, Eli Lilly, which manufactures the GLP-1 drug Zepbound, said that it was disappointed but would "continue to work with the Trump Administration and Congressional leaders to ensure people living with obesity are covered by Medicare and Medicaid and are no longer left behind."
Separately, Novo Nordisk, which manufactures the GLP-1 drug Wegovy, said it hopes the Trump administration will soon finalize the definition of obesity since "[i]t is essential that CMS regulations are aligned with current medical science — and that means recognizing obesity as a serious chronic disease."
"We're just back to the status quo, which is people on Medicare who need these drugs or want these drugs need to pay for them out of pocket," said Juliette Cubanski, deputy director of KFF's Program on Medicare Policy. "And given the high cost, that may be, for many people with Medicare, prohibitive in terms of access."
(Monaco, MedPage Today, 3/31; Emerson, Becker's Hospital Review, 3/25; Minemyer, Fierce Healthcare, 3/25; Sanger-Katz/Robbins, New York Times, 4/4; Goldman, Axios, 4/4; Muller/Tozzi, Bloomberg/Modern Healthcare, 4/4; Associated Press/MedPage Today, 4/5; Singh, Reuters, 4/7; Luhby, CNN, 4/4)
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.