Data remains a significant barrier for many organizations trying to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Many institutions struggle either to collect relevant data, analyze data to understand gaps and opportunities, or translate analysis into meaningful next steps. Without all three of these components, organizations can't effectively diagnose issues, set goals, measure efforts, and hold leaders accountable. When creating DEI strategies without these foundational data processes, organizations risk creating ineffective plans that are not based on data-informed priorities.
Children’s Health is a pediatric health care system based in North Texas. The system includes its flagship hospital, Children’s Medical Center Dallas, as well as Children’s Medical Center Plano, Our Children’s House inpatient rehabilitation hospital, the Children’s Health Care Network, specialty centers, rehabilitation facilities and physician services.
Before creating a new DEI strategy, Children's Health conducted a cultural climate audit to create an organizational baseline to inform DEI planning and implementation. Through the cultural climate audit, Children's Health collected and analyzed qualitative and quantitative data to understand employee experiences and pinpoint strengths to build on and disparities to address. The organization’s approach demonstrates where to find relevant data, as well as the importance of conducting a comprehensive assessment to create a data-informed strategy.
Children’s Health’s audit provided them with the necessary baseline data to create a DEI strategy with six defined priorities. Based on the results of the audit, the organization is also developing a Metrics Advisory Group, a Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) Dashboard and a D&I Impact Assessment.
Children’s Health’s cultural climate audit involved five key components. Organizations should look to this approach to not only understand how to find relevant DEI data, but also analyze and use this data for assessing baseline and developing a data-informed strategy.
Children’s Health collected qualitative data to learn about employee attitudes, feelings, and experiences, with a focus on differences between staff and leader perspectives. Focus groups that were divided between mid-level “leaders” (supervisors, team leaders, directors, and senior directors) and “staff” (individual contributors).
To collect this data, a research team conducted 25 listening sessions with 260 employees across six locations. To ensure that the listening session results were representative of the entire workforce, the groups covered: night, day and weekend shift staff; clinical and non-clinical staff; and individual contributor and leader groups. The groups included a mix of employees of different genders, races, sexual orientations, functional expertise, and organizational tenures.
The research team first spoke with all the Senior Vice Presidents to understand their perspective on DEI. Because having senior leaders or direct managers could prevent open conversation, members of the D&I team led the focus groups.
Each group was asked the same set questions focused on DEI, including:
Following the completion of the listening sessions, the team compared the perspectives of the senior Vice Presidents, the leader, and staff groups. Understanding differences in these perspectives was essential for Children's Health to ensure that DEI initiatives could grow sustainably and receive buy-in across all levels of the organization
The sample quotes below illustrate patterns that Children’s Health found. Specifically, “team members want to feel safe when voicing issues, concerns, and opinions. In the current organizational climate, some team members are finding it difficult to be open in their communication with leaders.” This analysis informed Children’s Health’s decision to prioritize improving inclusion competencies across all levels, increasing accountability, and building sustainability in their DEI strategy.
Senior leaders
Mid-level leaders
Frontline staff
Children's Health partnered with internal and external researchers to analyze the qualitative data. The University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, one of Children's Health's external partners, helped pushed the audit forward. The university researchers, in coordination with an internal researcher, translated the qualitative data into 21 actionable themes for the organization.
For example, the themes included D&I Programs and Outreach, Support of LGBTQ Community, and Career Mobility.
To gain quantitative data, Children’s Health included new inclusion-focused questions in their organization-wide 2019 employee engagement survey.
This allowed them to save time and resources by using a pre-existing resource to source additional quantitative data. Employees ranked the following statements on a Likert scale of 1-5 (1 – strongly disagree and 5 – strongly agree) to indicate how much they agreed with them:
For any employee who responded to a question with less than a 5 (strongly agree) on the Likert scale, the survey showed them follow-up questions:
The organization asked the same inclusion-focused questions a second time in 2020 and saw improvements in agreement for all four questions.
6% increase in agreement: If I raised a concern about ethics and integrity, I am confident my employer would do what is right.
9% increase in agreement: My workplace is committed to building the strengths of each team member.
5% increase in agreement: At work, I am treated with respect.
7% increase in agreement: Everyone at this organization is treated fairly regardless of ethnic background, race, gender, age, disability, or other differences not related to job performance.
Because there was minimal improvement for the questions on demonstrating respect and fairness for all and raising a concern about ethics and integrity, the organization will be dedicating more focus to these areas in their future strategy.
Children’s Health disaggregated and analyzed employee demographic data for additional quantitative information on employee outcomes. Specifically, Children’s Health assessed and published their overall workforce and leadership demographics by gender and race/ethnicity.
Through this analysis, Children’s Health quantified striking imbalances in representation. For example, while 51% of the workforce was white, 73% of leaders were white. Hispanic or Latino employees made up 22% of the workforce but only 9% of leadership. And while men represented only 21% of the workforce, they made up 33% of the leader population.
Children’s Health also further cut the data by dimensions of identity to gain a fuller understanding of the disparities at play. For example, the organization looked at the intersection of gender and race/ethnicity.
The figure below shows some of these findings. For example, the organization discovered that while white men represented only 9% of the workforce, they made up 47% of the senior leader population.
Children's Health was committed to sharing the cultural climate audit data to build trust and accountability. They shared their results in a diversity and inclusion impact report, titled “Looking Inward. Taking Action. Diversity and Inclusion at Children’s Health,” publicly available for download on their website.
In the report, the organization shared their workforce and leadership demographics, calling out opportunities to expand diversity at the leadership level. In addition, the organization shared results from the inclusion index survey measures, key areas for development, and a summary of quotes, both positive and constructive, from the focus groups. The report’s inclusion of these results— both positive and negative—demonstrates the organization’s dedication to transparency and accountability.
To sustain momentum, Children’s Health used the results of the cultural climate audit to inform their DEI roadmap for the future. Based on their findings, Children’s Health identified six priorities, with specific goals attached to each one.
Prior to the audit, Children’s Health did not have the necessary baseline data to determine their priorities and road map their strategy moving forward. From the audit, the organization identified 21 themes around awareness and engagement and 6 key D&I priorities. This is valuable because it is most beneficial for organizations to gather baseline data prior to diving into a strategy to ensure that resources are best used, and that the strategy is most effective.
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.