Health equity leaders understand that a meaningful health equity strategy requires a two-pronged approach to maximize impact: dedicated investment with protected resources and a clearly articulated, incentivized expectation that every other piece of the business contributes to health equity goals. But most healthcare organizations with health equity investments have focused primarily on the first prong — setting aside FTEs to fund a health equity leadership role, sometimes supported by a modest team.
This approach often leaves health equity leaders spread too thin, as they are asked to lead and contribute to efforts that span the entire organization. It not only weakens the impact of efforts under the health equity leader’s purview, but it also represents a missed opportunity to align and scale investments by embedding equity into cross-department strategic planning and operations.
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This is for members only. Learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.