Auto logout in seconds.
Continue LogoutHealth equity leaders understand that a meaningful health equity strategy requires a two-pronged approach to maximize impact: dedicated investment with protected resources and a clearly articulated, incentivized expectation that every other piece of the business contributes to health equity goals. But most healthcare organizations with health equity investments have focused primarily on the first prong — setting aside FTEs to fund a health equity leadership role, sometimes supported by a modest team.
This approach often leaves health equity leaders spread too thin, as they are asked to lead and contribute to efforts that span the entire organization. It not only weakens the impact of efforts under the health equity leader’s purview, but it also represents a missed opportunity to align and scale investments by embedding equity into cross-department strategic planning and operations.
To maximize the organization’s impact, health equity leaders must set significant time aside to build capacity for this work across teams and departments — and upgrade health equity from side of desk work. To expand health equity capabilities (and accountability) across the organization, health equity leaders should prioritize the four strategies below.
For much of the workforce in the healthcare industry, health equity is still a relatively new area of focus. Before health equity leaders can ask their colleagues to take on new responsibilities of embedding equity into their day-to-day work, leaders must ensure staff are equipped with baseline knowledge and skills. Health equity leaders can:
While education is important, health equity is a vast field, and it’s not feasible to expect that every team and department will become experts. Instead, help your partner teams pair foundational understanding with “health equity humility.” Drawing from the concept of cultural humility, health equity humility indicates an understanding that every individual brings their own identities, privileges, and unconscious biases into their work, making it important to remain open to continuous learning and feedback, even when it’s uncomfortable. Building this humility across your workforce can help avoid the formation of “health equity tourists” who “parachut[e] in to ‘discover’ a field that dates back more than a century…publishing naive and uninformed, and sometimes racist, research and ‘erasing’ scholars of color who created much of the discipline’s foundational work.”
Please note this does not mean an individual must have a certain identity to contribute meaningfully to health equity. That approach inadvertently puts all the work on historically marginalized groups, who may or may not want to be owners of the work or may feel tokenized. Health equity should be a core competency for all employees, though individuals from historically privileged groups should share their platforms and be especially open to critiques of their work and processes.
Even with the fundamentals down pat, functional leaders across the organization may need support in identifying the specific role they and their teams can play within the broad umbrella of health equity. The size and scope of each team’s health equity focus will inherently vary. Health equity leaders can play a valuable role in the brainstorming and opportunity assessment phase before handing off strategic planning and implementation to department leads. Use the following table as inspiration for finding your partner teams’ health equity niches.
Industry sector | Sample focus area by department |
All | Talent management: Diverse workforce pipeline, engagement and inclusion, recruitment and retention by demographic group, career pathing and training, employee benefit offerings. Community investment and social responsibility: Community partnerships, safe and affordable housing, accessible healthy food, local job opportunities and business growth. Sales and marketing: Authentic health equity branding, client engagement in health equity efforts. Government affairs: Policy advocacy for the social safety net, healthcare affordability, incentives for quality care and treatments. |
Provider organizations | Clinical care delivery: Equitable and evidence-based care standards, implicit biases and clinical misinformation, screening and referrals for social needs, care quality and patient experience across groups. Service line management: Geographic distribution of services, virtual/home care offerings and accessibility. Revenue cycle: Coverage and prior authorization negotiations, charity care policies. Strategic planning: Adoption of value-based care payment models, capital allocation across communities. |
Health plans | Coverage and utilization management: Preventive care coverage (physical and behavioral health), affordable plan options, efficient prior authorizations. Provider partnerships: High-quality accessible preferred provider networks, navigation to cultural or identity-aligned clinicians, provider education. Member engagement: Care management and navigation, social needs support. |
Life sciences companies | Clinical trial/product development: Diversity in pilot/study groups, use of real-world evidence. Strategic planning: Product affordability and coverage, investment in clinical areas that impact historically marginalized populations. |
Digital health organizations | Product design: Payment structure and affordability, mitigating bias in data and AI, demographic data collection and analysis. |
No matter the focus area, every department-level initiative must be paired with a thoughtful strategic plan to minimize resources spent and maximize potential impact. For the most part, drafting a health equity strategic plan is very similar to conducting any other. However, there are some unique dynamics to keep in mind. Encourage your partners across the organization to:
The next milestone health equity leaders can expect to assist with is in the assessment of investments and ensuring accountability for improvement. No team or department will execute their health equity efforts flawlessly, no matter their experience. Even with good intentions, many investments are designed to look good, not maximize a positive impact on marginalized populations. Bring a discerning eye to regular progress check-ins and help your partner teams identify where to apply appropriate skepticism. Some red flags include:
Share progress updates with senior leaders as a regular way to promote transparency and accountability for success. Ideally, your partner teams will have to select and share KPIs with senior leaders and may even have performance evaluations or compensation tied to the success of their efforts. These tactics help to ensure partner teams are applying the same level of strategic rigor to their health equity strategies as they would to any other key priority area.
As part of an effort to ensure strategic rigor, your partner team leaders will likely be asked to identify the direct financial ROI of their investment. For some business models, there will be a clear and measurable case. But chances are, if the business case for health equity initiatives were very strong, more of the industry would have acted by now. Your partner teams should highlight how equity work contributes to business impact beyond a direct financial ROI and articulate what senior leaders need to do differently to build a more meaningful business imperative.
However, focusing solely on business imperatives rather than the moral case for investment can alienate progressive partners and other stakeholders. As one community health equity leader put it, "The idea that we have to make a case for equity sickens me. It's immoral to ask the question...This work has to be based in the mission of healthcare, not the margin.”
The high stakes of this work can sometimes make teams hesitant to even begin. Be ready to reassure your partner teams that they will inevitably make mistakes in their health equity efforts, that is okay as long as individuals remain open to feedback, reflection, and adjust accordingly.
Scaling health equity work across the organization may garner internal and external pushback about the value of this investment. Inherently, health equity work will be perceived as more controversial or inflammatory than traditional initiatives and requires cross-organizational leaders to put an ethical stake in the ground around the mission of the organization. As such, the health equity leader should prepare their partner teams across the organization with communication and negotiation skills. Partner teams should be able to:
Common pushback | Potential responses |
[Organization] shouldn’t be talking about partisan topics. | Research has demonstrated that [health equity focus area] has a significant impact on our [workforce/patients/community/clients]. Since our organization has a vested interest in advancing positive outcomes for this group, investment here aligns with our business objectives, mission, and imperatives. |
This health equity issue isn’t a problem here. | It may not be, but Advisory Board’s research shows that this problem is more likely to be underdiagnosed, so it may be worth taking a closer look. Actually, we conducted extensive research and data analyses, and we found that inequities manifest here by… |
This problem is out of my control and not my job to fix. It’s not our fault, it’s because of the choices and behaviors of the [patient/workforce/ | Current literature has found that although the root causes of this issue go beyond the traditional scope of an organization like ours, healthcare leaders can play a significant role, including… |
Reassure your partners that sometimes the emotional reaction to the work is more important to get in front of than the factual specifics of a counterargument. Pushback is often rooted in defensiveness, and some people will instinctively feel targeted or blamed for being part of a historically privileged group, unless staff are able to quell those fears.
One question to ask to determine whether to engage in a confrontation: Is this person making an argument in good faith, or are they simply trying to undermine me? If the latter, it’s not worth your energy to engage. Remain polite, but firmly back up the value of your work and move on. But if it’s the former, engaging in a calm, open dialogue could shift someone from a detractor to a supporter. Be careful not to inadvertently undercut your work or cosign any biases in an effort to placate the detractor, as that can damage your standing with your supportive colleagues and health equity champions.
Health equity leaders are tasked with achieving ambitious goals — and rightly so, as the industry has far to go to achieving equitable outcomes in healthcare. The more these leaders can scale their impact by embedding health equity across the entire organization, the faster organizations will see progress across their KPIs.
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This is for members only. Learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.